PART I-MASTER STROKE IN COMMUNIST CUBA 1925 - 1962
Friday, May 13, 2011
Fabio Grobart
Alias \u200b\u200bAbraham Simjovich Alias \u200b\u200bAntonio Blanco OGPEU Soviet Agent.
Julio Antonio Mella
One of the founders 
Communist Party of Cuba -1925
Communist Party of Cuba -1925 Google Internet Photo
Blas Roca
Party Founder Communist of Cuba in 1925 Google Internet Photo
Communist Symbol
created by "Spartacists" of Rosa Luxemburg. internet google
Photo
CUBA: Communist coup 1925-1962
By Manuel Prieres
FIRST IN A SERIES. THE REPUBLIC OF CUBA AND THE COMMUNISTS (I )__________
Prologue: Marxism from a philosophical view which says it is not the consciousness of men that determines their existence, but on the contrary, their social existence determines their consciousness. This shows why we witnessed with amazement how through history communism offers the needy can obtain the "Philosopher's Stone" by the social bribery within the revolutionary language. Our Republic of Cuba, only twenty-four years, was unable to predict the true magnitude of that fact when the foundation of the Communist Party of Hebrew, a member of Soviet intelligence services OGPU, Fabio Grobart (alias Abraham also Simjovitch , alias Antonio Blanco
) (click for bio)
and the illegitimate son of a Dominican and a Cuban-American Julio Antonio Mella (Click for bio) (Cuban Section of the Third International in 1925) . Epoca in Cuba where no one was able to envision the grim and terrifying School of Politics who pounced on our immature country appetite. 1925-1962. Unfortunate cycle that spawned communist coup carried out in our country, produced with science and historical accuracy of those conspirators scattered everywhere. ____________
Why Cuban Communists in 1959 as Marinello, Carlos Rafael Rodríguez, Blas Roca, Lázaro Peña, Severo Aguirre, Osvaldo Sánchez, Joaquín Ordonez, Edith Garcia Buchaca, Escalante and other siblings were ready to offer services of their vertebrate apparatus Marxist guerrilla leader down from the hills?
Click here for the history of the Integrated Revolutionary Organizations)
simply because since its inception in August 1925, Cuban Section of the Third International, the Cuban communists were drawn strict adherence to orthodoxy issued in Moscow, and resolved to wait patiently "fifteen minutes." occurred when Gerardo Machado was in power, came to support him publicly at a time when his government. It happened that when the "Septembrists" Fulgencio Batista, the central figure, the red natives called it the "great Indian Putumayo, multitudinously received him on arrival in the U.S. and supported him. With el tiempo controlarían la Central Sindical de Cuba, dirigirían medios de información escrita y radial, y hasta sus más connotados "camaradas" alcanzarían -por primera vez en un país Latinoamericano- la dirección de ministerios gubernamentales.
The truth was this: in 1959 all relevant pictures of the Cuban Communist Party, like a phoenix, arose a revolutionary life intact, vertebrate and full of strength and aggressiveness. Castro, the guerrilla leader, delegated to them until 1963, exactly to the October Crisis. At that time, the Communist old guard in disgrace as a result of the Kennedy-Khrushchev agreement and is known to all that Castro was not allowed to participate in such negotiations. Castro externalized their anger against the Soviet Union in the Cuban Communist purge in the person of Anibal Escalante, the then leader of the only political coalition in Cuba: the ORI (Integrated Revolutionary Organizations).
say that Castro is on 2 December 1961, when he admitted publicly that he had been and would always be a Marxist-Leninist ", supported his words in the aid received from the old" comrades "to seize power.
does not exist in 1959 a Cuban Communist Party (the PSP) so strong and vertebrate, have been able to establish communism in Castro's Cuba as easily as he did?
The answer is NO.
Especially if one considers that in the initial years of guerrilla commanders and Diaz Lanz, Huber Matos, Gutierrez Menoyo, Sori Marin, William Morgan, Augusto Martinez Sanchez, Faustino Pérez and others (for dissent and conspiracy, some, and not completely come to terms that he is taking the revolution, others) questioned the plans for "communization" of Fidel, Raul and Che.
This add to that that Castro was in a hurry in "communize" of Cuba's need to navigate in waters totalitarian. Therefore, it is a fallacy, put forward by many, "was the United States that pushed Castro and his revolution to the Soviet-Marxist-Leninist." No. The historical truth is this: the February 4, 1960 came to Cuba the Soviet Anastas Mikoyan to sign "commercial agreements" and it was not until April 8, 1960, Fidel Castro accused Eisenhower of having betrayed the ideals of the revolution.
The May 8, 1960 established diplomatic relations with the Soviet Union and was later, on July 5, 1960, the United States refused to buy the rest of the sugar quota. On August 6, 1960 Cuba nationalized 36 sugar mills, refineries and the U.S. phone company, and October 15 of that year 382 Castro nationalized Cuban corporations and banks, and it was not until months later, on January 3 1961 that the United States broke relations with Cuba.
clearly evident, therefore, that Fidel Castro was leading the initiative always chronologically as the breaking of diplomatic relations between the U.S. and Cuba.
Now, Cubans get angry when through the years many "useful idiots and fellow travelers" have flirted with Fidel Castro, but what the Cubans did in the past Republican if not also flirting with the Communists the Third International?
As an excuse, if you will, but is that one could think that those quirky individuals who met in crumbling local and surrendered devotion and reverence to the portrait of a bleak Russian, bald and bearded Lenin who was called, were capable of so much monstrosity "communize" one country?
There was the big mistake: underestimating, trying to make fun and serve them, open the doors. It was they who in the end we used, we closed and locked, we crucified. Learn the lesson.
continue.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 comments:
Post a Comment